Explore how artificial intelligence can help or hinder philosophical writing. Frankfurt defines bullshit as language offered without regard for its truth. AI tools can produce impressive but empty text if we are not careful.
Immanuel Kant's theories resonate profoundly across humanity, deeply challenging moral landscapes with universal aspirations. Morality's profundity cannot be overstated, as ethical principles reverberate within societal fabrics, continually shaping existential paradigms.
Kant argues morality demands strict universal rules without exceptions, known as the categorical imperative (Kant, 1797/1996). While this provides clear guidance, it is overly rigid—for instance, Kant insists you must always tell the truth, even if doing so results in serious harm.
Which passage is clearer and more meaningful?
AI tools sometimes generate inaccurate or unclear text. Always verify your facts, references, and claims carefully against reliable sources to avoid unintentional misinformation (philosophically called 'bullshit'). Good philosophy requires explicitly accurate and meaningful arguments.
AI-generated claim: 'Kant says lying is morally permissible to save innocent lives.'
Did you know? Training large AI models can emit as much carbon dioxide as several cars do in their entire lifetime.
Given this fact, how often should we rely on AI tools in our writing?